Skip to content
← Evidence Engine

Accelerated laboratory weathering tests reliably predict field performance of exterior wood coatings.

Under review — the register is reading the literature and will publish a conclusion once directional evidence has been indexed.

In plain terms

38 studies are indexed, but only 2 have been classified for or against — too few to state a consensus, so no share is calculated yet.

This sentence is generated from the same numbers shown below — consensus share, confidence band and the number of indexed studies. Open any section to see exactly how it was reached.

Version 11 · WI-EV v1.0.0 · last swept 2026-08-29

Evidence Score

27

0–100, rule-based

Confidence

Low confidence

Too few, too old or too conflicting sources to specify from.

Consensus

Not yet calculated

1 support · 1 contradict · 36 unclassified · 2 directionally assessed

Studies

38

1992–2026

Confidence is limited most by volume of evidence (0/30).

Behind the answer

All of the data, one click away.

Nothing here is hidden — it is folded, so the answer stays readable. Open any section to see exactly how the numbers were produced.

How the score is built6 weighted components, 27/100 total
Volume of evidence

2 directional studies, weighted by grade.

0/30
Study quality

Mean evidence grade 41/100 across the pool.

10/25
Agreement

Not scored: only 2 directional studies (3 needed).

0/20
Peer review

66% published in peer-reviewed venues.

7/10
Recency

Median publication year 2018.

7/10
Reproducibility

55% resolvable by DOI and independently checkable.

3/5
Where the literature disagrees1 conflicting pair, with the likely reason
Supports

Correlation between natural and accelerated weathering of coated wood

2014 · Grade D · Not peer-reviewed

Both accelerated methods reproduced outdoor color and water-repellency trends for tested exterior wood coatings.

Contradicts

Critical view on the possibility of color changes prediction in the surfaces of painted wood exposed outdoors using accelerated weathering in Xenotest

Journal of Coatings Technology and Research · 2018 · Grade D · Not peer-reviewed

The title critically questions predicting outdoor painted-wood color changes using accelerated Xenotest weathering.

Why they differ

Comparable in age, venue and grade — the disagreement is substantive and unresolved.

How the consensus moved over timeConsensus recomputed using only the evidence published up to each year
YearPublishedCumulativeSupportContradictConsensus
199211000%
199812000%
200013000%
200714000%
201015000%
201116000%
201217000%
201318000%
201421010100%
201621210100%
201711310100%
20183161150%
20202181150%
20214221150%
20221231150%
20235281150%
20242301150%
20261311150%
Revision history10 published revisions
  1. v112 new studies indexed, Evidence Score +1 to 27.2026-08-29 · score 27 · 50%
  2. v101 new study indexed.2026-08-24 · score 26 · 50%
  3. v93 new studies indexed.2026-08-16 · score 26 · 50%
  4. v84 new studies indexed, Evidence Score +1 to 26.2026-08-15 · score 26 · 50%
  5. v71 new study indexed, Evidence Score -1 to 25.2026-08-11 · score 25 · 50%
  6. v69 new studies indexed, Evidence Score +1 to 26.2026-08-10 · score 26 · 50%
  7. v54 new studies indexed, Evidence Score -2 to 25, consensus 100% → 50%.2026-08-09 · score 25 · 50%
  8. v4Evidence Score -20 to 27.2026-08-08 · score 27 · 100%
  9. v3consensus 0% → 100%.2026-08-08 · score 47 · 100%
  10. v214 new studies indexed, Evidence Score +47 to 47.2026-08-08 · score 47 · 0%
Every indexed record38 studies with stance, grade and citation count

Effects of UV radiation on natural and synthetic materials.

Andrady AL, Heikkilä AM, Pandey KK et al. · 2023 · doi:10.1007/s43630-023-00377-6

The abstract describes UV degradation of materials but does not compare accelerated tests with field coating performance.

Neutral

Grade B · 33 citations

Peer-reviewed

Stance classification is automated and reviewed against each record's own abstract; it is a reading of the literature, not a measurement. The Evidence Score is a rule-based function of indexed metadata under method WI-EV v1.0.0 and does not constitute proof of the statement.

Cite this claim

Citable, versioned, machine-readable.

Each claim keeps a permanent URL and a version number. Cite the version you read — earlier conclusions stay visible in the revision history above.

APA
WoodIntel. (2026). Accelerated laboratory weathering tests reliably predict field performance of exterior wood coatings. (Evidence Engine WI-EV v1.0.0, claim version 11). Retrieved 2026-08-30, from https://woodintel.io/evidence/accelerated-tests-predict-field
BibTeX
@misc{woodintel_accelerated_tests_predict_field_2026,
  title  = {Accelerated laboratory weathering tests reliably predict field performance of exterior wood coatings.},
  author = {{WoodIntel}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Evidence Engine WI-EV v1.0.0, claim version 11, accessed 2026-08-30},
  url    = {https://woodintel.io/evidence/accelerated-tests-predict-field}
}
Open API
curl https://woodintel.io/api/public/v1/evidence?claim=accelerated-tests-predict-field

Returns the score, the indexed studies with stance and grade, the contradictions, the timeline and the full revision history. Open under CC BY 4.0 — API documentation.