Skip to content
← Evidence Engine

Charring rates of cross-laminated timber under standard fire exposure are predictable within the Eurocode 5 design assumptions.

The direction is unclear: only 0 directional studies are available (3 needed).Under review

In plain terms

The direction is unclear: only 0 directional studies are available (3 needed).

This sentence is generated from the same numbers shown below — consensus share, confidence band and the number of indexed studies. Open any section to see exactly how it was reached.

Version 19 · WI-EV v1.7.0 · last swept 2026-11-02

Evidence strength
Insufficient evidence
Unclear

How much and how good the evidence is, not whether the claim is true.

Confidence
Low confidence

Too few, too old or too conflicting sources to specify from.

Consensus
Not yet calculated

0 support · 0 contradict · 24 relevant – no direction · 0 directional

Studies
24

2008–2026

Insufficient evidence: 0 relevant directional studies (3 needed for a score).

Directional studies by test type
(a) Validation against observed decay or field performance0
(b) Comparison with another model or method, no observed outcomes0
(c) Application of the method without validation0

This claim is about a method, so studies are sorted by whether they test it against observed outcomes. Only (a) and (b) can take a side; (a) weighs more. Applications without validation count as relevant with no direction, and the publication that first proposed the method never counts for its own reliability. Reviews are listed separately and never counted as directional studies (4 reviews).

Behind the answer

All of the data, one click away.

Nothing here is hidden — it is folded, so the answer stays readable. Open any section to see exactly how the numbers were produced.

Stance basis for the 24 pooled studies: 0 judged from full text · 24 abstract only. Full-text verdicts count only after a staff reviewer approves them.

How the score is built6 weighted components, —/100 total
Volume of evidence

0 directional studies, weighted by grade.

0/30
Study quality

Mean evidence grade 52/100 across the pool.

13/25
Agreement

Not scored: only 0 directional studies (3 needed).

0/20
Peer review

88% published in peer-reviewed venues.

9/10
Recency

Median publication year 2023.

10/10
Reproducibility

38% resolvable by DOI and independently checkable.

2/5
Where the literature disagreesNo direct contradictions in the indexed pool

No direct contradictions in the indexed pool. That is not the same as agreement — it can also mean too few directional studies have been published to disagree yet.

How the consensus moved over timeConsensus recomputed using only the evidence published up to each year
YearPublishedCumulativeSupportContradictConsensus
200811000%
200912000%
201013000%
201214000%
201415000%
201716000%
201817000%
201918000%
2020210000%
2023313000%
2024417000%
2025421000%
2026324000%
Revision history18 published revisions
  1. v19WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.2026-11-01 · score insufficient · 0%
  2. v18WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.2026-10-14 · score insufficient · 0%
  3. v17WI-EV v1.5.0: method claim — studies re-tiered as validation against observed outcomes (0 directional), comparison with another model (0 directional) or application without validation (never directional, 0 relevant). Original source excluded from directional evidence (circularity rule): 0. 0 directional studies. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.2026-10-14 · score insufficient · 0%
  4. v16WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (4), 0 duplicate records merged. 24 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.2026-10-14 · score insufficient · 0%
  5. v153 new studies indexed.2026-10-14 · score insufficient · 0%
  6. v1415 new studies indexed.2026-10-14 · score insufficient · 0%
  7. v13WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 10 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 3 new studies indexed.2026-10-14 · score insufficient · 0%
  8. v12WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 30 of 37 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 7 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.2026-10-12 · score insufficient · 0%
  9. v111 new study indexed, Evidence strength -1 to 34.2026-10-09 · score 34 · 0%
  10. v101 new study indexed.2026-09-01 · score 35 · 0%
  11. v91 new study indexed.2026-08-17 · score 35 · 0%
  12. v81 new study indexed.2026-08-09 · score 35 · 0%
  13. v7Evidence strength -20 to 35.2026-08-08 · score 35 · 0%
  14. v64 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +5 to 55.2026-08-08 · score 55 · 0%
  15. v51 new study indexed, Evidence strength -3 to 50.2026-08-08 · score 50 · 0%
  16. v44 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +3 to 53.2026-08-07 · score 53 · 0%
  17. v310 new studies indexed, Evidence strength -1 to 50.2026-08-05 · score 50 · 0%
  18. v214 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +51 to 51.2026-08-04 · score 51 · 0%
Every indexed record24 studies with stance, grade and citation count

Charring rate of Korean larch (Larix kaempferi) CLT wall panels: Effect of adhesive type and applicability of fire design models

In-Rak Choi, Ah-Yeon Seo, In-Hwan Yeo et al. · 2026 · Case Studies in Construction Materials · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06307 · Validation vs observed outcomes

The study compares measured CLT charring rates with Eurocode 5, but the provided abstract gives no comparison outcome.

Found by citation chaining — cites doi:10.3390/jcs10030140

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade C · 0 citations

Peer-reviewed

CLT Layer Fall-Off under Fire: Numerical Models and Probabilistic Analysis

Tongchen Han, Solomon Tesfamariam · 2026 · Journal of Structural Engineering · doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-16401 · Validation vs observed outcomes

The framework models CLT fall-off and charring under standard fire, but reports no Eurocode 5 validation result.

Found by citation chaining — cites doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104163

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade C · 0 citations

Peer-reviewed

Fire resistance of wooden dowelled cross-laminated timber panels under in-plane loading

Angelo Aloisio, Dag Pasquale Pasca, Massimo Fragiacomo · 2025 · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120592 · Application, no validation

The standard-fire test measured CLT cross-section reduction but reports no comparison with Eurocode 5 charring predictions.

Found by citation chaining — cites doi:10.17159/2309-8775/2020/v62n1a4

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 9 citations

Peer-reviewed

Experimental determination of the charring rate of cross-laminated timber panels

Mika Alanen, Mikko Malaska, Mikko Salminen et al. · 2024 · Fire Safety Journal · doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104163 · Application, no validation

The study experimentally determines CLT charring rates, but the available abstract gives no Eurocode 5 prediction comparison.

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 8 citations

Peer-reviewed

Effect of protective cladding on the fire performance of vertically loaded cross-laminated timber (CLT) wall panels

Muhammad Yasir, Andrew Macilwraith, C. O’Ceallaigh et al. · 2023 · Journal of Structural Integrity and Maintenance · doi:10.1080/24705314.2023.2189683 · Application, no validation

CLT walls were tested under standard fire curves, but the abstract gives no charring-rate comparison with Eurocode 5.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.3390/fire6090352

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 5 citations

Peer-reviewed

EXPERIMENTAL AND FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF IRISH SITKA SPRUCE CLT WALL PANELS UNDER EXPOSURE TO STANDARD FIRE CONDITIONS

Muhammad Yasir, C. O’Ceallaigh, Kieran Ruane et al. · 2023 · World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE) · doi:10.52202/069179-0227 · Validation vs observed outcomes

The study measured Sitka spruce CLT charring under ISO 834, but the abstract reports no comparison with Eurocode 5 predictions.

Conference paper (not journal peer review) · Found by citation chaining — cites doi:10.17159/2309-8775/2020/v62n1a4

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade D · 3 citations

Not peer-reviewed

Experimental and numerical analysis on fire behaviour of loaded cross-laminated timber panels

Yuexiang Wang, Jin Zhang, Mei Fang et al. · 2019 · Advances in Structural Engineering · doi:10.1177/1369433219864459 · Application, no validation

Tests measured charring rates of loaded CLT panels under standard fire, but the abstract gives no Eurocode comparison result.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104163

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 33 citations

Peer-reviewed

Simulation of the Fire Resistance of Cross-laminated Timber (CLT)

Joachim W. Schmid, Michael Klippel, Alar Just et al. · 2018 · Fire Technology · doi:10.1007/s10694-018-0728-9 · Application, no validation

The title indicates simulation of CLT fire resistance but gives no finding comparing charring predictions with Eurocode 5 assumptions.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.1177/1369433219864459

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade C · 24 citations

Peer-reviewed

Design of Cross-Laminated Timber in Fire

Michael Klippel, Joachim W. Schmid · 2017 · Structural Engineering International · doi:10.2749/101686617x14881932436096 · Validation vs observed outcomes

CLT fire-test char depths were compared with a European charring model, but the abstract reports no comparison outcome.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.3390/fire6090352

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 51 citations

Peer-reviewed

Fire Tests on Loaded Cross-laminated Timber Wall and Floor Elements

M. Kippel, Claude Leyder, Andréa Frangi et al. · 2014 · Fire Safety Science · doi:10.3801/iafss.fss.11-626 · Application, no validation

Loaded CLT panels were tested under standard fire curves, but no charring-rate or Eurocode 5 comparison result is given.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.2749/101686617x14881932436096

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 65 citations

Peer-reviewed

Fire Resistance of Cross-Laminated Timber Panels Loaded Out of Plane

Massimo Fragiacomo, Agnese Menis, Isaia Clemente et al. · 2012 · Journal of Structural Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000787 · Validation vs observed outcomes

Standard-fire tests measured CLT charring depth and rate but report no comparison with Eurocode 5 assumptions.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.1177/1369433219864459

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 54 citations

Peer-reviewed

Cross-laminated timber in fire

Joachim W. Schmid, Jürgen König · 2010 · Application, no validation

Title addresses CLT in fire but states no finding about charring-rate predictions or Eurocode 5 assumptions.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.2749/101686617x14881932436096

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade C · 5 citations

Peer-reviewed

Experimental analysis of cross-laminated timber panels in fire

Andréa Frangi, Mario Fontana, Erich Hugi et al. · 2009 · Fire Safety Journal · doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.07.007 · Application, no validation

The title establishes experimental CLT fire analysis but states no result concerning Eurocode 5 charring predictions.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.3390/fire6090352

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 199 citations

Peer-reviewed

Fire behaviour of cross-laminated solid timber panels

Andréa Frangi, Mario Fontana, Markus Knobloch et al. · 2008 · Fire Safety Science · doi:10.3801/iafss.fss.9-1279 · Application, no validation

Experimental and numerical CLT fire analyses are reported, but no finding on charring-rate agreement with Eurocode 5 is stated.

Found by citation chaining — reference of doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.07.007

Stance not stated in abstract

Judged from abstract

Grade B · 70 citations

Peer-reviewed

Reviews and syntheses4 reviews — shown for context, never counted as directional studies or in the volume of evidence.

FIRE DESIGN OF CLT IN EUROPE

Birgit Östman, Joachim W. Schmid, Michael Klippel et al. · 2018 · Wood and Fiber Science · doi:10.22382/wfs-2018-041

How this claim was searched15 records screened in the last search · 24 relevant · 13 relevant added via citation chaining
Records screened
15
Passed wood-domain rule
14
Relevant in pool
24
Relevant via citation chaining
13

Last search 2026-10-30 · WI-EV v1.6.0 · 0 new records added to the queue (0 from 0 citation-chain records, 0 from 1 IRG-WP documents). Every record passes the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier; screened counts are unique records across all queries and sources.

Queries used (6)

  • Primary · cross laminated timber charring rate fire exposure Eurocode 5 delamination
  • cross-laminated timber char layer fall-off fire test
  • CLT charring rate furnace test EN 1995-1-2
  • mass timber fire delamination char rate
  • glulam charring rate one-dimensional notional
  • timber fire resistance charring adhesive

Sources: 16 open registries (primary query) · OpenAlex wood-domain search (all queries) · IRG-WP documents (all queries) · OpenAlex citation chaining

Excluded as not relevant147 studies removed from the pool and every score component. Kept here for audit with the reason.

Supplementary data to large-scale fire experiment with exposed cross-laminated timber in ceiling - #FRIC-01

The dataset reports temperatures from a large-scale compartment fire, not charring rates under standard fire exposure or Eurocode 5 predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.6.0 · 2026-10-18
doi:10.18710/ZIYHH3

One-component polyurethane adhesives in timber engineering applications: A review

The review concerns polyurethane adhesives in timber engineering, without testing CLT charring or Eurocode 5 fire assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103358

Recent development and challenges in enhancing fire performance on wood and wood-based composites: A 10-year review from 2012 to 2021

The review addresses fire-retardant treatments broadly, not CLT charring rates under standard fire or Eurocode 5 predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.jobab.2023.10.004

Cross-laminated timber–concrete composite structural floor system: A state-of-the-art review

The title reviews CLT–concrete composite floors without indicating standard-fire charring measurements or Eurocode validation.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105766

Perceived obstacles to multi-storey timber-frame construction: an Australian study

The study investigates perceived barriers to timber-frame construction, not CLT fire behavior.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1080/00038628.2014.912198

Engineered Wood Products for Construction

The book provides a general engineered-wood overview without findings on CLT charring or Eurocode 5 predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.5772/intechopen.92960

Fire protection of light and massive timber elements using gypsum plasterboards and wood based panels: A large-scale compartment fire test

The title concerns protective linings in a compartment fire test, not bare CLT charring under standard exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.027

Analytical Methods for Determining Fire Resistance of Timber Members

The title addresses general analytical fire-resistance methods without establishing CLT charring predictability under Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2565-0_55

Structural performance of hybrid SPFs-LSL cross-laminated timber panels

The title addresses mechanical performance of hybrid CLT panels, not charring rates or fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.131

Structural capacity in fire of laminated timber elements in compartments with exposed timber surfaces

The experiments examine thermal penetration in real compartment fires, including decay, rather than charring under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.10.084

Evaluating the mechanical and fire-resistance properties of modified fast-growing Chinese fir timber with boric-phenol-formaldehyde resin

The title concerns resin-modified Chinese fir fire resistance, not CLT charring under Eurocode assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.035

Pres-Lam Buildings: State-of-the-Art

The study concerns seismic performance of post-tensioned timber buildings rather than CLT charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002603

Outlook for Cross-Laminated Timber in the United States

The research evaluates CLT market potential and adoption barriers, not fire performance.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.15376/biores.9.4.7427-7443

Cross-laminated timber (CLT) – a state of the art report

The review discusses CLT properties and regulatory harmonization without findings on standard-fire charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.14256/jce.2071.2017

Sustainable Construction for Urban Infill Development Using Engineered Massive Wood Panel Systems

The study addresses sustainability and user acceptance, not CLT charring under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/su4102707

Structural performance of box based cross laminated timber system used in floor applications

The study evaluates structural performance of box-based CLT floors, not charring rates or Eurocode 5 fire assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.14288/1.0071796

Dynamic life cycle carbon and energy analysis for cross-laminated timber in the Southeastern United States

The study models CLT carbon and energy impacts across its life cycle, not standard-fire charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc5e6

Life Cycle Assessment of Forest-Based Products: A Review

The review examines environmental life-cycle performance of forest products, not CLT fire behavior.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/su11174722

Life cycle performance of Cross Laminated Timber mid-rise residential buildings in Australia

The title concerns life-cycle performance of CLT buildings rather than charring under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110091

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Produced in Western Washington: The Role of Logistics and Wood Species Mix

The study assesses CLT production life-cycle impacts from logistics and species mix, not fire charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/su11051278

Durability and protection of mass timber structures: A review

The title concerns general durability and protection of mass timber, not standard-fire charring or Eurocode 5 predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103731

Mass timber – the emergence of a modern construction material

The paper reviews mass-timber characteristics, construction, and research needs without testing CLT charring predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1080/24705314.2017.1354156

Low carbon construction systems using prefabricated engineered solid wood panels for urban infill to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions

The title concerns low-carbon prefabricated wood construction rather than CLT charring or Eurocode 5 fire design.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.scs.2012.08.004

Awareness, perceptions and willingness to adopt Cross-Laminated Timber by the architecture community in the United States

The study concerns architects’ awareness and adoption of CLT, not its fire or charring performance.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.090

A Review of the Performance and Benefits of Mass Timber as an Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Improving the Sustainability of Structures

The review addresses mass timber sustainability benefits rather than CLT charring under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/su14095570

Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development

The title indicates a general CLT overview without establishing findings on fire charring or Eurocode 5 predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5

Fire resistance of timber joists and load bearing wall frames

The study models standard-fire resistance of timber joists and framed walls, not CLT charring under Eurocode 5 assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

The Reduced Cross-Section Method for the Design of Timber Structures Exposed to Fire—Background, Limitations and New Developments

Describes Eurocode 5's residual-section method generally, without testing CLT charring-rate predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.2749/101686612x13363929517578

Special Issue on Timber in Fire

Special-issue title provides no specific evidence about CLT charring rates or Eurocode assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s10694-015-0539-1

Fire safety of bonded structural timber elements

Title concerns bonded structural timber generally and states no CLT charring finding.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3929/ethz-a-010171655

Timber frame assemblies exposed to standard and parametric fires: part 2: a design model for standard fire exposure

Develops a standard-fire model for solid timber-frame assemblies, not cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Fire safety in timber buildings - Technical guideline for Europe.

Provides broad timber fire-design guidance without testing CLT charring-rate predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material

General wood engineering handbook provides no stated finding on CLT charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.2737/fpl-gtr-190

Fire Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Slabs: Two-Way Action

Title concerns two-way structural action of CLT slabs in fire, not charring-rate predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0376-9_28

Bonded timber deck plates in fire

Title concerns bonded timber deck plates rather than cross-laminated timber charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Development of prefabricated timber-concrete composite floors

Develops timber-concrete composite floors without addressing fire exposure or charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1201/b15267-304

Fire Safety of Glued-Laminated Timber Beams in Bending

Tests adhesive effects on glued-laminated beams, not CLT charring predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001781

Thermal Expansion Of Wood And Timber-concrete Composite Members Under Iso-fire Exposure

Studies thermal expansion of timber and timber-concrete slabs, not CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3801/iafss.fss.7-1111

Analysis of the behavior of multiple dowel timber connections in fire

The analysis concerns multiple-dowel timber connections in fire, not CLT charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.05.024

Thermo-mechanical behaviour of dovetail timber joints under fire exposure

The study examines dovetail timber joints under fire rather than CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.11.008

Charring model for timber frame floor assemblies with void cavities

The charring model concerns timber-frame floors with void cavities, not cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2007.12.009

Structural modelling of light-timber framed walls in fire

The study concerns structural modelling of light-timber framed walls rather than CLT charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/s0379-7112(00)00053-9

WALL2D: A model for predicting heat transfer through wood-stud walls exposed to fire

The validated model predicts heat transfer in gypsum-protected wood-stud walls, not charring of CLT.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1018(1998070)22:4<133::aid-fam642>3.0.co;2-l

Background document of prEN 13381-7 ; Test methods for determining the contribution to the fire resistance of structural members : Part 7 ; Applied protection to timber members –

The document concerns applied fire protection for generic timber members, not CLT charring-rate predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Natural Full-Scale Fire Test on a 3 Storey XLam Timber Building

The XLam building was subjected to a natural full-scale fire, not standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Behavior of dowelled and bolted steel-to-timber connections exposed to fire

The study concerns fire behavior of steel-to-timber connections rather than CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.010

Tall Timber Buildings: What’s Next in Fire Safety ?

The title addresses general tall-timber fire safety without specifying CLT charring or Eurocode 5 predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s10694-015-0497-7

Review of Recent Research Activities on One-Component PUR-Adhesives for Engineered Wood Products

The review concerns PUR adhesives, not CLT charring rates under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7811-5_37

Fire performance of timber construction

The review addresses broad timber-building fire performance without CLT charring-rate evidence or Eurocode 5 validation.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1002/1528-2716(200007/09)2:3<278::aid-pse33>3.0.co;2-p

Review and analysis of fire resistance tests of timber members in bending, tension and compression with respect to the Reduced Cross-Section Method

The title reviews generic timber-member fire resistance without identifying CLT charring-rate validation.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2014.05.006

Thermal stability of glued wood joints measured by shear tests

The title concerns thermal stability of glued joints through shear tests, not CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s00107-010-0411-4

Shear behaviour of bond lines in glued laminated timber beams at high temperatures

The title examines glued-laminated timber bond-line shear at high temperatures, not CLT charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s00226-004-0223-y

Structural fire design according to Eurocode 5—design rules and their background

The paper reviews generic Eurocode 5 timber charring rules without establishing their accuracy for CLT.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1002/fam.873

The Reduced Cross-Section Method for Evaluation of the Fire Resistance of Timber Members: Discussion and Determination of the Zero-Strength Layer

The title concerns generic timber fire-resistance methodology without identifying CLT or testing its charring predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s10694-014-0421-6

Charring rates and temperature profiles of wood sections

The study measures generic timber charring under ISO fire but does not examine cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1002/fam.819

Design in timber to BS 5268

The chapter addresses ambient structural timber design to BS 5268, not CLT charring under fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1201/b18121-15

CLT handbook : cross-laminated timber

The title identifies CLT but states no fire exposure, charring property, or Eurocode comparison.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Structural Design for Fire Safety

The overview discusses general structural fire safety without CLT charring measurements or Eurocode 5 validation.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1002/9781118700402

Comprehensive Study and Development Trends of Fire Performance in Timber Structures

The generic title reports timber-structure fire performance trends without establishing findings on CLT charring or Eurocode 5 assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81635-2_32

Effect of electric vehicle fire hazard on the fire design of contemporary timber-framed house garage in Australia

The study addresses non-standard electric-vehicle fires in timber-framed garages, not CLT charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2026.111442

Integrated computational-robotic workflow for complex timber-only structures

The study concerns robotic fabrication of timber-only frames, not CLT charring or standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2026.106887

Bibliometric analysis of studies on structural timbers in Türkiye and thematic evaluation of experimental research

The bibliometric review maps Turkish mass-timber research themes without testing CLT charring-rate predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1177/20426445261440572

Resistance of different barrier materials against hydrogen jet flames: CLT, Gypsum and Steel-sandwich

CLT barriers were exposed to hydrogen jet flames rather than standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2026.106078

Innovative Dovetail Massive Wood Board Elements

The article concerns adhesive-free dovetailed wood boards and does not establish standard-fire charring performance.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.65775/livenarch.1572773

A Critical Review of Full-Scale Fire Tests and Prediction Methods for Timber–Concrete Composite Slab Floors

The review reports variable fire resistance and char fall-off in timber–concrete floors, not CLT charring-rate agreement with Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-16191

Interface-level bond performance of Eucalyptus-rubberwood hybrid CLT: Effects of adhesive type and bonding pressure

The study measures interlaminar shear bonding in hybrid CLT, not fire-induced charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.147793

Structural Performance of Glulam Beams Improved by Composing the Cross-Section with Lamellae of Different Strength Classes

The study models strength-class arrangements in glulam beams without standard-fire charring exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/jcs10080438

Experimental research on the post-fire semi-rigid behavior of the glulam bolted joints with slotted-in steel plates

The experiments assess post-fire behavior of glulam bolted joints rather than CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03488

Assessment of the Main Obstacles to the Spread of Timber Building Systems Towards the Carbon and Climate Neutrality

The title concerns broad obstacles to timber-building adoption and provides no CLT charring or Eurocode 5 evidence.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74723-6_22

Structural performance of a novel dovetailed timber panel subjected to out-of-plane bending

The study evaluates out-of-plane bending of dovetailed timber slabs, not CLT charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05095

Views of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) Manufacturer Representatives around the World on CLT Practices and Its Future Outlook

Manufacturer interviews address CLT practices and market outlook rather than measured charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/buildings13122912

Time–Cost Analysis of Construction of Administrative Buildings Using Wood-Based Construction Systems

The analysis compares construction time and cost for wood systems, not fire performance.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/app142311176

Life cycle assessment of an entirely wood floor system designed for carbon negativity, future adaptability, and end-of-life de/re/construction

The assessment concerns lifecycle carbon and adaptable wood floor systems, not CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1088/2634-4505/adf665

Flexural Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber Panels with Environmentally Friendly Timber Edge Connections

The study investigates CLT flexural behavior and edge connections, not standard-fire charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/buildings14051455

Measurement of air permeance in mass timber elements assembled through the dovetail technique

The study measures air permeance of dovetailed mass timber rather than charring behavior.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110009

Space Efficiency in Tall Timber Buildings: A Comprehensive Review

The review concerns space efficiency in tall timber buildings, not fire exposure or charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.54175/hsustain4020008

An Experimental Comparison of Airborne Sound Insulation between Dovetail Massive Wooden Board and Cross-Laminated Timber Elements

The experiment compares airborne sound insulation rather than fire-induced charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/buildings13112809

High-Rise Timber Offices: Main Architectural and Structural Design Parameters

The study examines architectural and structural parameters of high-rise timber offices, not CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/buildings14071951

A state-of-the-art review on connection systems, rolling shear performance, and sustainability assessment of cross-laminated timber

The review addresses CLT connections, rolling shear, and sustainability, not charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118552

From Trees to Skyscrapers: Holistic Review of the Advances and Limitations of Multi-Storey Timber Buildings

The review concerns multi-storey timber-building advances broadly, with no stated test of CLT charring predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/buildings12081263

Reaction to fire performance of wood and other building products

Cone-calorimeter measurements concern ignition, heat release, and smoke rather than structural CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

IMPLICATIONS OF A DOWN-STAND BEAM ON THE CEILING FLAME EXTENSION CHARACTERISTICS IN A LARGE-SCALE CLT ENCLOSURE FIRE EXPERIMENT

The experiments address flame extension in propane-fuelled enclosure fires, not standard-fire charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.52202/069179-0242

Proceedings of the Joint Conference of COST Actions FP1402 a FP1404 Cross Laminated Timber : A competitive wood product for visionary and fire safe buildings

The proceedings description broadly promotes fire-safe CLT buildings without reporting standard-fire charring measurements.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Utilization of Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Timber with Defects in Production of Engineered Wood Products

The study evaluates physical and mechanical properties of Scots pine panels, not fire charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.5552/drvind.2023.0048

FIRE SAFE USE OF WOOD IN BUILDINGS - GLOBAL DESIGN GUIDE

The paper describes general timber fire-safety guidance without testing CLT charring rates or Eurocode predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.52202/069179-0603

Timber under real fire conditions – the influence of oxygen content and gas velocity on the charring behavior

The experiments examine timber charring in non-standard fires with varying oxygen and gas velocity.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1108/jsfe-01-2017-0013

Finnish Multi-Story Timber-Framed Apartment Buildings: Tampere Residents’ Perspectives

The study measures residents’ perceptions of timber apartments, not fire-induced CLT charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/buildings12111998

Experimental Study of the Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity of Spruce Wood

The title concerns spruce thermal conductivity, not CLT charring under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s10765-023-03238-7

Tall Wooden Residential Buildings in Finland: What Are the Key Factors for Design and Implementation?

The chapter examines design and implementation of Finnish tall timber buildings without testing CLT charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.5772/intechopen.98781

Preliminary Design Proposals for Dovetail Wood Board Elements in Multi-Story Building Construction

The paper proposes dovetail wood elements and discusses adhesives and fasteners, not CLT charring predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/architecture1010006

The Influence of the Damage of Mortise-Tenon Joint on the Cyclic Performance of the Traditional Chinese Timber Frame

The study examines cyclic performance of damaged mortise-tenon timber frames, not fire-induced CLT charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/app9163429

Economic and environmental life cycle perspectives on two engineered wood products: comparison of LVL and GLT construction materials

The work compares life-cycle economics and environmental impacts of LVL and glulam, not CLT fire charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1007/s11356-022-24079-1

Normal contact performance of mortise and tenon joint: theoretical analysis and numerical simulation

The study models compressive contact in mortise-and-tenon joints rather than CLT behavior under fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1186/s10086-021-01963-x

An Overview of CLT Research and Implementation in North America

The title indicates a broad overview of North American CLT research without specifically addressing standard-fire charring or Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Contemporary tall residential timber buildings: what are the main architectural and structural design considerations?

The case-study findings concern architectural and structural configurations, not CLT charring rates or Eurocode fire assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1108/ijbpa-10-2021-0142

Wood Preservation Practices and Future Outlook: Perspectives of Experts from Finland

The study concerns wood preservation and climate-related mold, not structural fire charring of CLT.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/f13071044

Is Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) a Wood Panel, a Building, or a Construction System? A Systematic Review on Its Functions, Characteristics, Performances, and Applications

The systematic review discusses CLT functions and applications without establishing charring-rate predictability under Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/f14020264

Main Design Considerations and Prospects of Contemporary Tall Timber Apartment Buildings: Views of Key Professionals from Finland

The interview study addresses design considerations for tall timber apartments, not CLT charring under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/su13126593

Burning Properties of Combined Glued Laminated Timber

The study measures combustion of combined glued-laminated timber, a different product from CLT.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/fire7010030

Adhesive-and Metal-Free Assembly Techniques for Prefabricated Multi-Layer Engineered Wood Products: A Review on Wooden Connectors

The review examines adhesive- and metal-free wood assembly techniques, not CLT fire performance.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/f14020311

Seismic Design of Timber Buildings: Highlighted Challenges and Future Trends

The review concerns seismic design of timber buildings rather than fire exposure and charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/app10041380

Fire safety engineering in timber buildings

The title addresses timber-building fire engineering generally without identifying CLT charring-rate findings.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.05.002

Charring rate of wood as a tool for fire investigations

The title concerns generic wood charring for fire investigations, not CLT design under Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.05.006

Review of state of the art of dowel laminated timber members and densified wood materials as sustainable engineered wood products for construction and building applications

The review focuses on dowel-laminated timber and densified wood, not CLT charring under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.dibe.2019.100004

Cross-laminated timber for building construction: A life-cycle-assessment overview

The review evaluates CLT life-cycle environmental performance rather than fire exposure or charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104482

Development of sustainable bio-adhesives for engineered wood panels – A Review

The review addresses bio-based adhesives and formaldehyde emissions rather than CLT fire charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1039/c7ra06598a

Influence of Acetylation on Fire Resistance of Beech Plywood

The experiment measures ignition and glowing of acetylated beech plywood, not CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Cross-Laminated Timber: A Global Review of Standards and Research

The review concerns general CLT standards and research without establishing charring-rate predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.21275/sr26430211930

Assessing the Fire Integrity Performance of Cross-Laminated Timber Floor Panel-to-Panel Joints

Assesses fire integrity of CLT panel joints rather than charring-rate predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11210

Fire resistance tests on cross-laminated timber floor panels : an experimental and numerical analysis

The title concerns CLT floor fire resistance, but no charring-rate or Eurocode 5 result is reported.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.22215/etd/2013-07044

Performance of Post-Tensioned Timber and Engineered Timber Adhesives with Fire Exposure

Models post-tensioned timber failure and adhesive performance rather than CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.22215/etd/2018-13403

Modular cross-laminated timber buildings

Discusses modular CLT construction without testing fire exposure or charring.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Sustainable Development Advantages of Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) and Cross-Laminated Bamboo and Timber (CLBT)

Reviews sustainability and mechanical performance without assessing fire charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/ma18214913

Hygrothermal Performance of Southern Pine Cross-Laminated Timber.

Addresses hygrothermal performance rather than charring under fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14

Modelling charring of timber exposed to natural fire

Models generic timber under natural fires rather than CLT under standard fire exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.1186/s10086-023-02091-4

Charring Depth and Charring Rate of Resak and Jelutong Timber Beams in Two-Dimensional Fire

Measures charring of solid Malaysian hardwood beams rather than cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2026.58.4.8

A Study on the Charring Properties of Glued Laminated Korean Larch Timber Columns

Tests Korean larch glued-laminated columns rather than cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.3.0 · 2026-10-14
doi:10.3390/su16209130

Numerical simulation of fire integrity resistance of full-scale gypsum-faced cross-laminated timber wall

The study models integrity resistance of gypsum-faced CLT walls rather than validating charring rates against Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.06.003

Physics-Based Modelling of Wildland–Urban Interface Fire Exposure to a Cross-Laminated Timber Building Under Variable Conditions

The modeled exposure is a variable wildland–urban interface fire rather than standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.3390/fire9090368

Effects of Oxygen Concentration on the Reaction to Fire of Cross-Laminated Timber in a Controlled-Atmosphere Cone Calorimeter

The study examines reaction-to-fire behavior under oxygen-depleted conditions, not standard-fire charring-rate predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/s10694-023-01518-0

Two-Dimensional Charring Rate for Laminated Veneer Lumber from Malaysian Tropical Timber

The tested product is laminated veneer lumber, not cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5837-4_5

Self-extinguishment of cross-laminated timber

The title concerns CLT self-extinguishment rather than charring-rate predictability under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.01.008

Effects of the cooling phase on the fire performance of encapsulated timber elements

The study examines encapsulated CLT during the cooling phase, outside the claim's standard-fire exposure scope.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3121/1/012035

Meta-analysis of temperature, heat release rate, delamination and auto-extinction of timber compartments

The meta-analysis examines compartment temperatures, heat release, delamination, and extinction rather than standard-fire CLT charring rates.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104164

Delamination of Cross-laminated timber and its impact on fire development | Focusing on different types of adhesives

The title addresses adhesive-dependent delamination and fire development, not charring-rate agreement with Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12

Deflection behavior and load-bearing period of structural glued laminated timber beams in fire including cooling phase

The study concerns glulam beam deflection and load-bearing performance rather than CLT charring predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0009

Thermal behavior of adhesively bonded timber‐concrete composite slabs subjected to standard fire exposure

The specimens are timber-concrete composite slabs, not standalone cross-laminated timber elements governed by the claim.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1002/fam.3235

One-dimensional charring rate of Glulam manufactured from Malagangai (Potoxylon melagangai) species treated with fire retardant

The study tests fire-retardant-treated glulam rather than cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.54113/j.suem.2025.000001

One-Dimensional Charring Rate for Laminated Veneer Lumber from Malaysian Tropical Timber

The tested product is laminated veneer lumber, not cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5837-4_4

Overview and Evaluation of Chemicals and Methods for Flame Retardancy in Glued Laminated Wood Systems.

The review concerns flame-retardancy methods for plywood and LVL rather than CLT charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.3390/polym17111459

Mechanical and Fire Performance of Innovative Hollow Glue-Laminated Timber Beams.

The experiments tested glued laminated beams rather than CLT.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.3390/polym14163381

Delamination and char fall-off in fire exposed cross-laminated timber loaded in shear

The title concerns delamination and char fall-off under shear rather than standard-fire charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.14264/a067f63

Components and Consequences of Cross-Laminated Timber Delamination

The title concerns CLT delamination rather than charring-rate predictability under standard fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/978-981-10-0376-9_27

Contemporary Fire Safety Engineering in Timber Structures: Challenges and Solutions

The review broadly addresses timber fire safety without evaluating CLT charring rates under standard exposure.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.3390/fire7010002

Summary of the fire protection foundation report - fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings

The report summarizes tall-wood fire-safety research gaps without testing Eurocode 5 charring assumptions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1186/s40038-015-0009-3

Fire Safety of Mass timber Buildings with CLT in USA

The abstract discusses mass-timber fire safety and building codes without testing CLT charring-rate predictions.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.22382/wfs-2018-042

Charring depth and charring rate of cross-laminated bamboo slabs exposed to a one-sided standard fire

The tested product was cross-laminated bamboo rather than timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103439

Behaviour of Loaded Cross-Laminated Timber Wall Elements in Fire Conditions

The title concerns loaded CLT wall behavior without identifying standard exposure or charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/S10694-015-0516-8

Structural fire engineering considerations for cross-laminated timber walls

The title concerns structural fire engineering of CLT walls without establishing charring-rate predictability.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126605

Structural response of fire-exposed cross-laminated timber beams under sustained loads

The CLT beams underwent non-standard heating to assess structural response, not standard-fire charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.08.002

Fire Resistance of Partially Protected Cross-Laminated Timber Rooms

The CLT rooms were tested under a non-standard parametric fire.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10728

Contribution of cross laminated timber panels to room fires

The record concerns CLT contributions to room fires rather than standard-fire charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.22215/etd/2013-06885

Fire Resistance of Timber Panel Structures Under Standard Fire Exposure

The title does not identify CLT or charring-rate prediction.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/S10694-016-0578-2

A Review of Factors Affecting the Burning Behaviour of Wood for Application to Tall Timber Construction

The review discusses general wood combustion without evaluating CLT charring rates against Eurocode 5.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/s10694-018-0787-y

Material properties and external factors influencing the charring rate of solid wood and glue‐laminated timber

The review addresses solid wood and glued laminated timber rather than CLT.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1002/fam.1055

The charring depth and charring rate of glued laminated timber after a standard fire exposure test

The study concerns glued laminated timber rather than cross-laminated timber.

Classifier · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.02.010

Assessment of Eurocode 5 Charring Rate Calculation Methods

No wood-domain term (wood, timber, lumber, softwood, hardwood, cladding or a species name) in title or abstract.

Wood-domain rule · WI-EV v1.2.0 · 2026-10-12
doi:10.1007/s10694-009-0092-x

Stance classification is automated and reviewed against each record's own abstract; it is a reading of the literature, not a measurement. The Evidence strength is a rule-based function of indexed metadata under method WI-EV v1.7.0 and does not constitute proof of the statement.

Cite this claim

Citable, versioned, machine-readable.

Each claim keeps a permanent URL and a version number. Cite the version you read — earlier conclusions stay visible in the revision history above.

APA
WoodIntel. (2026). Charring rates of cross-laminated timber under standard fire exposure are predictable within the Eurocode 5 design assumptions. (Evidence Engine WI-EV v1.7.0, claim version 19). Retrieved 2026-11-02, from https://woodintel.io/evidence/clt-charring-rate-predictability
BibTeX
@misc{woodintel_clt_charring_rate_predictability_2026,
  title  = {Charring rates of cross-laminated timber under standard fire exposure are predictable within the Eurocode 5 design assumptions.},
  author = {{WoodIntel}},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {Evidence Engine WI-EV v1.7.0, claim version 19, accessed 2026-11-02},
  url    = {https://woodintel.io/evidence/clt-charring-rate-predictability}
}
Open API
curl https://woodintel.io/api/public/v1/evidence?claim=clt-charring-rate-predictability

Returns the score, the indexed studies with stance and grade, the contradictions, the timeline and the full revision history. Open under CC BY 4.0 — API documentation.