confidence low → moderate.
52
Moderate confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
Evidence Engine · WI-EV v1.7.0
A living evidence synthesis is only trustworthy if its changes are visible. Every recomputation that altered a conclusion, a score or a confidence band is written here, permanently, in the order it happened.
120
14
2026-11-01
confidence low → moderate.
52
Moderate confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
consensus 85% → 84%, confidence moderate → low.
58
Low confidence
84% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 24 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 19 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (2 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 46 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (2 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 48 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 1 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 4 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 20 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 13 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Contradicted. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (1 support, 3 contradict). Evidence strength 45/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
8% consensus · 56 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (3 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength 45/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
100% consensus · 41 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (14 support, 1 contradict). Evidence strength 52/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
52
Low confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (12 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength 55/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
55
Low confidence
100% consensus · 65 studies
WI-EV v1.7.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (14 support, 2 contradict). Evidence strength 58/100; moderate confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
58
Moderate confidence
85% consensus · 55 studies
1 new study indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 48 studies
1 new study indexed.
58
Moderate confidence
85% consensus · 55 studies
Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 46 studies
Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
100% consensus · 41 studies
Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
8% consensus · 56 studies
confidence moderate → low.
52
Low confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 20 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 24 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 13 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (2 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 47 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 1 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 4 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (2 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 48 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Unclear. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (0 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 19 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Contradicted. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (1 support, 3 contradict). Evidence strength 45/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
8% consensus · 57 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (3 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength 45/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
100% consensus · 42 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (14 support, 1 contradict). Evidence strength 52/100; moderate confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
52
Moderate confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (12 support, 0 contradict). Evidence strength 55/100; low confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
55
Low confidence
100% consensus · 65 studies
WI-EV v1.6.0: Supported. Direction calculated from existing weighted primary studies (14 support, 2 contradict). Evidence strength 58/100; moderate confidence. Verdict thresholds: two-thirds weighted support or opposition, otherwise Mixed; fewer than three directional studies = Unclear. Score arithmetic, classifications and confidence thresholds unchanged. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
58
Moderate confidence
85% consensus · 54 studies
1 new study indexed.
45
Low confidence
8% consensus · 57 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 53 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 13 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 13 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 48 relevant primary studies, 2 directional (1 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 1 new study indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 48 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 53 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 47 relevant primary studies, 2 directional (1 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 47 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 19 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 19 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 4 relevant primary studies, 1 directional (1 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 4 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: method claim — studies re-tiered as validation against observed outcomes (0 directional), comparison with another model (0 directional) or application without validation (never directional, 0 relevant). Original source excluded from directional evidence (circularity rule): 0. 0 directional studies. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 24 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 20 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 20 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: method claim — studies re-tiered as validation against observed outcomes (2 directional), comparison with another model (1 directional) or application without validation (never directional, 0 relevant). Original source excluded from directional evidence (circularity rule): 1. 3 directional studies. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
45
Low confidence
100% consensus · 42 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: method claim — studies re-tiered as validation against observed outcomes (4 directional), comparison with another model (0 directional) or application without validation (never directional, 0 relevant). Original source excluded from directional evidence (circularity rule): 1. 4 directional studies. No score was set by hand. 1 new study indexed, Evidence strength -1 to 45.
45
Low confidence
8% consensus · 56 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 32 relevant primary studies, 15 directional (3 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. confidence low → moderate.
52
Moderate confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 65 relevant primary studies, 12 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
55
Low confidence
100% consensus · 65 studies
WI-EV v1.5.0: tiers re-checked; above-ground field studies (EN 330, L-joint, lap-joint, double-layer, in-service surveys) are tier (a) for above-ground claims. 54 relevant primary studies, 16 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. 1 new study indexed.
58
Moderate confidence
85% consensus · 54 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (16), 4 duplicate records merged. 54 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 54 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (10), 9 duplicate records merged. 53 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 53 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (4), 1 duplicate record merged. 19 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 19 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (4), 0 duplicate records merged. 24 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 24 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (6), 2 duplicate records merged. 20 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 20 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (5), 3 duplicate records merged. 47 relevant primary studies, 2 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 47 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (0), 5 duplicate records merged. 13 relevant primary studies, 0 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 13 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (3), 1 duplicate record merged. 4 relevant primary studies, 1 directional (1 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 4 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (7), 4 duplicate records merged. 55 relevant primary studies, 4 directional (4 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. Evidence strength +2 to 46.
46
Low confidence
8% consensus · 55 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (13), 1 duplicate record merged. 47 relevant primary studies, 2 directional (1 field in the claim's exposure). Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 47 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (8), 0 duplicate records merged. 42 relevant primary studies, 3 directional (1 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. Evidence strength -3 to 45.
45
Low confidence
100% consensus · 42 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (9), 3 duplicate records merged. 32 relevant primary studies, 15 directional (3 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. Evidence strength -11 to 52, consensus 99% → 98%, confidence moderate → low.
52
Low confidence
98% consensus · 32 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (16), 2 duplicate records merged. 65 relevant primary studies, 12 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. Evidence strength -15 to 55, confidence moderate → low.
55
Low confidence
100% consensus · 65 studies
WI-EV v1.4.0: studies weighted by test type (field in the claim's exposure > field elsewhere > laboratory > mechanism), reviews moved out of the directional pool (14), 3 duplicate records merged. 53 relevant primary studies, 16 directional (0 field in the claim's exposure). No score was set by hand. Evidence strength -15 to 58, consensus 87% → 85%.
58
Moderate confidence
85% consensus · 53 studies
28 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 64 studies
3 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 28 studies
1 new study indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 13 studies
2 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 54 studies
13 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 72 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
2 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 7 studies
13 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +1 to 44.
44
Low confidence
8% consensus · 65 studies
4 new studies indexed.
46
Low confidence
100% consensus · 61 studies
5 new studies indexed, Evidence strength -1 to 48.
48
Low confidence
100% consensus · 50 studies
5 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +7 to 63, consensus 98% → 99%.
63
Moderate confidence
99% consensus · 42 studies
19 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +3 to 70.
70
Moderate confidence
100% consensus · 82 studies
5 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +2 to 73, consensus 86% → 87%.
73
Moderate confidence
87% consensus · 70 studies
30 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +4 to 67.
67
Moderate confidence
100% consensus · 63 studies
16 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 23 studies
28 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +6 to 71, consensus 83% → 86%.
71
Moderate confidence
86% consensus · 65 studies
22 new studies indexed, consensus 100% → 98%, confidence low → moderate.
56
Moderate confidence
98% consensus · 37 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
4 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 5 studies
28 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +49 to 49.
49
Low confidence
100% consensus · 45 studies
9 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 12 studies
44 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +46 to 46.
46
Low confidence
100% consensus · 57 studies
20 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 52 studies
41 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 59 studies
28 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 36 studies
15 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 25 studies
18 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 26 studies
34 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +6 to 43, consensus 17% → 8%.
43
Low confidence
8% consensus · 52 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 33 relevant studies, 8 directional. No score was set by hand. 9 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +6 to 63, confidence low → moderate.
63
Moderate confidence
100% consensus · 33 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 7 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 2 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 7 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 37 relevant studies, 14 directional. No score was set by hand. 11 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +5 to 65, consensus 100% → 83%, confidence low → moderate.
65
Moderate confidence
83% consensus · 37 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 15 relevant studies, 6 directional. No score was set by hand. 3 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +1 to 56.
56
Low confidence
100% consensus · 15 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 17 relevant studies, 2 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 1 new study indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 17 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 3 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 2 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 3 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 13 relevant studies, 2 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 7 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 13 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 32 relevant studies, 1 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 10 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 32 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 18 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 9 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 18 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 8 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 6 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 8 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 10 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 3 new studies indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 10 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 8 relevant studies, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 1 new study indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 8 studies
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 18 relevant studies, 3 directional. No score was set by hand. 5 new studies indexed, Evidence strength +37 to 37, consensus 50% → 17%.
37
Low confidence
17% consensus · 18 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
WI-EV v1.3.0 recall expansion: expanded query set, IRG-WP documents and OpenAlex citation chaining; every new record passed the same wood-domain rule and relevance classifier. 1 relevant study, 1 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence. No score was set by hand. 1 new study indexed.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 1 studies
Evidence strength +1 to 60.
60
Low confidence
100% consensus · 26 studies
Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 6 studies
Re-swept; no change to the published figures.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 7 studies
Evidence strength +1 to 55.
55
Low confidence
100% consensus · 12 studies
Evidence strength +2 to 57.
57
Low confidence
100% consensus · 24 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 16 of 17 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 1 relevant study remains, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 1 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 22 of 24 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 2 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 2 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 18 of 27 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 9 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 9 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 35 of 40 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 5 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 5 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 30 of 43 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 13 relevant studies remain, 2 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
50% consensus · 13 studies
Silicate-based surface treatments measurably slow the surface weathering of exterior softwood.
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 29 of 29 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 0 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 0 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 16 of 23 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 7 relevant studies remain, 1 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 7 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 33 of 41 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 8 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 8 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 30 of 37 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 7 relevant studies remain, 0 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
0% consensus · 7 studies
WI-EV v1.2.0 relevance fix: 3 of 25 previously counted studies removed as not relevant (reasons kept in the public audit log); 22 relevant studies remain, 1 directional. Evidence strength withheld: insufficient evidence.
Insufficient evidence
Low confidence
100% consensus · 22 studies
Scores are rule-based functions of indexed literature metadata under method WI-EV v1.7.0. A revision records a change in the published record, not a change in the underlying material behaviour.