Research Agenda · WI-GAP v1.0.0
Most knowledge platforms publish what is known. This page publishes what is not. Every tracked claim is scored on how badly it needs new primary work — thin evidence, unresolved dissent, ageing studies and a low evidence strength — and paired with the study that would close the gap. The ranking is a deterministic function of the register, so anyone can reproduce it.
Of 14 tracked statements, 1 cannot be settled from the published record as it stands. The list below is ordered by how badly each one needs new primary work, and each row says what kind of study would close it.
14
1
7
Open questionA reconciliation study explaining why 1 indexed record disagrees with the current conclusion — differing exposure, method or measure.
Open questionA reconciliation study explaining why 3 indexed records disagree with the current conclusion — differing exposure, method or measure.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Detailing — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on CLT fire — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Acetylation — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Mass timber — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Coating maintenance — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Larch — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Preservative treatment — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Moisture — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Carbon — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Thermal modification — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Decay modelling — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Open questionHigher-grade evidence on Substitution — controlled or long-run field work rather than the present mix.
Gap score = 0.35 × thin record + 0.25 × unresolved dissent + 0.20 × ageing evidence + 0.20 × low evidence strength, each term normalised to 0–100. A thin record is measured against a reference of 12 indexed studies; ageing evidence saturates at 10 years since the most recent indexed publication. A high gap score is not a verdict on the claim — it states that the open literature cannot currently settle it.